Skip to main content

Know which security risks to fix first

We assess infrastructure, applications, cloud accounts, Kubernetes, CI/CD, IAM, secrets, and operating process, then deliver a clear remediation roadmap.

Built for teams that need actionable findings, not a generic scanner export.

Schedule security auditCompare audit options

Risk-ranked findings

Each finding includes impact, evidence, likelihood, owner guidance, and remediation direction.

Infrastructure and application view

Cloud, Kubernetes, networks, IAM, secrets, applications, dependencies, APIs, and CI/CD reviewed together.

Compliance-aware output

Findings can be mapped to SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, or internal control expectations where in scope.

Service playbook

From problem to operating evidence

Main content is structured like a case study: context first, scoped work next, then the operating changes and evidence a team can use after handoff.

Service briefWho it is forWhat we auditPackagesAudit process

A security audit gives your team a clear, prioritized view of security risk across the systems that matter. We combine configuration review, architecture review, process review, and targeted testing so the final report explains what to fix, why it matters, and what evidence supports the recommendation.

Case-study lens

Scoped

Problem, responsibility, and handoff boundaries before implementation.

Evidence

Dashboards, runbooks, reviews, and operating records over borrowed logos.

Outcomes

Conservative summaries focused on observable operational improvement.

EvidenceSection 01

Who it is for

Runbooks, dashboards, reviews, and handoff material make the work auditable.

Team situationWhy this audit fits
Preparing for enterprise customersYou need credible security evidence and a remediation plan
Security ownership is fragmentedWe connect cloud, app, CI/CD, IAM, and process risks in one report
Compliance work is startingWe identify control gaps before formal audit pressure increases
Recent growth increased attack surfaceWe review exposed services, access, dependencies, and deployment paths
Leadership needs prioritizationWe separate urgent risk from low-value hardening work
EvidenceSection 02

What we audit

Reliability signals are treated as decision evidence, not dashboards for their own sake.

AreaReview scope
Cloud and infrastructureaccounts, networks, public exposure, logging, encryption, backups, baseline controls
Identity and accessIAM policies, SSO, privileged access, stale users, service accounts, key handling
Kubernetes and containersRBAC, namespaces, pod security, image sources, secrets, network policies, ingress
Applications and APIsauth flows, authorization boundaries, input handling, API exposure, data protection
CI/CD and supply chainsecrets in pipelines, dependency risk, image scanning, runner permissions, approvals
Compliance postureSOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, or internal controls where relevant to the engagement
OutcomeSection 03

Packages

Expected changes are framed as practical operating improvements, not unsupported guarantees.

PackageBest forTypical deliverables
Security SnapshotTeams needing a fast initial viewHigh-level risk review, quick wins, top remediation priorities
Standard Security AuditMost product and infrastructure teamsFull report, evidence, severity ratings, remediation roadmap
Compliance Readiness ReviewTeams preparing for auditsControl gap map, evidence checklist, remediation plan
Remediation SupportTeams that want help fixing findingsImplementation backlog, pull requests or config changes, validation notes
EvidenceSection 04

Audit process

Reliability signals are treated as decision evidence, not dashboards for their own sake.

  1. Scope and access — define systems, environments, repositories, cloud accounts, compliance goals, and testing boundaries.
  2. Discovery — map assets, identities, data paths, deployment paths, and externally exposed surfaces.
  3. Assessment — review configuration, architecture, source or dependency data where in scope, and operating process.
  4. Risk analysis — rank findings by impact, likelihood, exploitability, and business context.
  5. Report and walkthrough — present executive summary, technical findings, remediation plan, and next-step options.
ScopeSection 05

Deliverables

The work is broken into visible capabilities, acceptance points, and handoff artifacts.

  • executive summary for leadership
  • technical findings report with evidence
  • severity-ranked remediation checklist
  • affected systems, likely impact, and recommended owner for each finding
  • compliance or control mapping where in scope
  • follow-up session to answer implementation questions
OutcomeSection 06

Outcomes you can measure

The result is described as an operating change the team can observe, review, and sustain.

  • security priorities are ranked instead of debated from anecdotes
  • known external exposure and privileged access are documented
  • remediation work can be assigned to engineering owners
  • compliance gaps are visible before the formal audit process
  • repeatable checks can be added to CI/CD or cloud governance
  • leadership can track risk reduction over time
EvidenceSection 07

Proof we leave behind

Runbooks, dashboards, reviews, and handoff material make the work auditable.

EvidenceWhy it matters
Asset and access notesShows what was reviewed and what was out of scope
Finding evidenceLets engineers reproduce or verify the issue
Severity rationaleExplains why one issue matters more than another
Remediation roadmapTurns the audit into a work plan
Control mappingSupports compliance and customer-security conversations
Operating modelSection 08

What this is not

Responsibilities, response paths, and technical changes are made explicit before work starts.

This is not an unlimited penetration test or a compliance certification. If you need formal penetration testing, red-team exercises, or certification support, we scope those separately with clear rules of engagement.

Next stepSection 09

Related services

Decision points and common questions are made explicit so follow-up work is scoped cleanly.

Next stepSection 10

Getting started

Decision points and common questions are made explicit so follow-up work is scoped cleanly.

Start by scoping the audit. We will confirm systems, access, testing boundaries, compliance goals, and the report format your team needs. Schedule security audit →

Next stepSection 11

Frequently asked questions

Decision points and common questions are made explicit so follow-up work is scoped cleanly.

How long does a security audit take? A focused audit can often be completed in one to two weeks after access is ready. Larger environments or compliance mapping can take longer.

Do you need source-code access? Only if application or dependency review is in scope. Many infrastructure-focused audits can start with cloud, Kubernetes, CI/CD, and architecture access.

Can you help fix findings? Yes. Remediation support can be scoped as a follow-up project or ongoing plan.

Will the report satisfy customers or auditors? The report can support customer-security and compliance conversations, but it is not a formal certification unless separately scoped with the required audit body.

Ready to get started?

Book a quote review or talk to an engineer.

Get pricing

Pricing

Flexible scopes available. if you need custom terms or bundled service pricing.

Fixed project price
4.800 €

Comprehensive security posture assessment. Delivered in ~4 days.

  • Vulnerability assessment across infrastructure and applications
  • IAM and access control review
  • Network segmentation and firewall audit
  • Prioritized remediation report with executive summary
Talk to a senior engineer

Need a clearer path for Security Audit?

We'll help you understand fit, scope, pricing, and the fastest practical next step for your team.

No obligation • Senior engineer review • Recommendations grounded in your current stack