Skip to main content

A decision-ready view of your infrastructure

We assess architecture, reliability, security, performance, cost, and operating process, then deliver an executive summary and technical roadmap.

Use it before scaling, migrating, buying managed support, or committing to a platform rebuild.

Request infrastructure auditView security audit

Whole-system assessment

Cloud accounts, networks, Kubernetes, databases, CI/CD, observability, access, cost, and ownership reviewed together.

Prioritized roadmap

Findings ranked by risk, impact, effort, owner, and recommended next step.

Buyer-ready evidence

Executive summary, technical report, diagrams, and action plan suitable for leadership and engineering.

Service playbook

From problem to operating evidence

Main content is structured like a case study: context first, scoped work next, then the operating changes and evidence a team can use after handoff.

Service briefWho it is forWhat we assessPackagesAudit process

An infrastructure audit gives your team a practical, evidence-based view of what is working, what is risky, and what should be fixed first. It is the best starting point when infrastructure feels messy but the right service package is not obvious yet.

Case-study lens

Scoped

Problem, responsibility, and handoff boundaries before implementation.

Evidence

Dashboards, runbooks, reviews, and operating records over borrowed logos.

Outcomes

Conservative summaries focused on observable operational improvement.

EvidenceSection 01

Who it is for

Runbooks, dashboards, reviews, and handoff material make the work auditable.

Team situationWhy this audit fits
Infrastructure grew faster than processWe identify ownership, architecture, security, and cost gaps
Leadership needs a modernization roadmapWe translate technical findings into priorities and sequencing
Reliability issues are recurringWe inspect architecture, observability, incidents, and operational readiness
Cloud or Kubernetes costs are unclearWe review usage, waste, sizing, and accountability
You need to choose between servicesThe audit clarifies whether DevOps, SRE, cloud, Kubernetes, or security work should come first
Operating modelSection 02

What we assess

Responsibilities, response paths, and technical changes are made explicit before work starts.

AreaReview scope
Architecturetopology, dependencies, service boundaries, scalability, high availability
Reliabilityincidents, monitoring, alerting, backups, restore, failover, capacity, runbooks
SecurityIAM, network exposure, secrets, encryption, Kubernetes controls, CI/CD risks
Performanceresource utilization, database pressure, latency, bottlenecks, noisy neighbors
Costwaste, rightsizing, commitments, licensing, environment sprawl, owner mapping
Operationsownership, change process, documentation, deployment process, support model
OutcomeSection 03

Packages

Expected changes are framed as practical operating improvements, not unsupported guarantees.

PackageBest forTypical deliverables
Infrastructure SnapshotTeams needing quick prioritizationHigh-level map, top risks, quick-win recommendations
Standard Infrastructure AuditMost teams needing a roadmapExecutive summary, technical report, diagrams, prioritized action plan
Modernization AssessmentTeams planning a platform changeTarget-state options, migration sequencing, cost and risk tradeoffs
Audit plus Remediation PlanTeams ready to move immediatelyAudit deliverables plus scoped backlog for DevOps, SRE, cloud, or Kubernetes work
EvidenceSection 04

Audit process

Reliability signals are treated as decision evidence, not dashboards for their own sake.

  1. Scope — define environments, systems, stakeholders, access boundaries, and business goals.
  2. Discovery — collect architecture diagrams, cloud accounts, repositories, CI/CD, incidents, monitoring, costs, and operational notes.
  3. Assessment — review technical configuration and operating evidence across architecture, reliability, security, performance, and cost.
  4. Prioritization — rank findings by risk, impact, effort, dependencies, and owner.
  5. Delivery — present executive summary, technical report, diagrams, and recommended service path.
ScopeSection 05

Deliverables

The work is broken into visible capabilities, acceptance points, and handoff artifacts.

  • executive summary for leadership
  • technical findings report with evidence
  • current-state architecture notes or diagrams
  • prioritized action plan ranked by impact and effort
  • modernization or remediation roadmap
  • follow-up Q&A session with engineering stakeholders
OutcomeSection 06

Outcomes you can measure

The result is described as an operating change the team can observe, review, and sustain.

  • infrastructure risks are visible and ranked
  • leadership and engineering share one roadmap
  • owners can be assigned to specific findings
  • cloud or Kubernetes spend can be reviewed against real usage
  • reliability and security gaps are no longer hidden in separate conversations
  • next service package or project scope is easier to choose
EvidenceSection 07

Proof we leave behind

Runbooks, dashboards, reviews, and handoff material make the work auditable.

EvidenceWhy it matters
Current-state mapShows how systems actually connect
Risk registerKeeps findings visible after the audit
Cost and utilization notesConnects spend to workloads and owners
Security and access notesShows high-risk exposure and permission gaps
Prioritized roadmapTurns the audit into a sequence of decisions
EvidenceSection 08

Recommended next steps after an audit

Reliability signals are treated as decision evidence, not dashboards for their own sake.

Primary findingRecommended service
Delivery pipelines are the bottleneckCI/CD Audit or DevOps as a Service
Reliability and incidents are the largest riskSRE as a Service
Cloud foundation is weak or undocumentedCloud Infrastructure
Cloud governance and spend need ownershipCloud Account Management
Kubernetes is unstable or under-ownedManaged Kubernetes or Kubernetes Support
Security findings dominateSecurity Audit or remediation support
Next stepSection 10

Getting started

Decision points and common questions are made explicit so follow-up work is scoped cleanly.

Start with an infrastructure audit when the right fix is not obvious. We will assess the environment and return a prioritized roadmap for leadership and engineering. Request infrastructure audit →

Next stepSection 11

Frequently asked questions

Decision points and common questions are made explicit so follow-up work is scoped cleanly.

How is this different from a security audit? A security audit focuses deeply on security risk. An infrastructure audit is broader and covers architecture, reliability, performance, cost, operations, and security at a roadmap level.

Do you need production access? We define access during scoping. Many findings require read-only cloud, monitoring, CI/CD, and repository access; remediation work is scoped separately.

Can the audit lead into implementation? Yes. The audit roadmap can become a DevOps, SRE, cloud, Kubernetes, or security remediation project.

How long does it take? Small environments can often be assessed in one to two weeks. Larger or regulated environments require a scoped timeline.

Ready to get started?

Book a quote review or talk to an engineer.

Get pricing

Pricing

Flexible scopes available. if you need custom terms or bundled service pricing.

Fixed project price
3.200 €

Architecture and reliability review. Delivered in ~3 days.

  • Infrastructure architecture review
  • Cost and performance analysis
  • Scalability and resilience assessment
  • Actionable recommendations report
Talk to a senior engineer

Need a clearer path for Infrastructure Audit?

We'll help you understand fit, scope, pricing, and the fastest practical next step for your team.

No obligation • Senior engineer review • Recommendations grounded in your current stack